• Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    Only the supposed richest country in the world would force their postal employees to drive around in vehicles that were built in the 1980’s. WTF! That is worse than 3rd World. FFS, the Deutsche Post use electric bicycles, electric delivery vehicles and modern Mercedes-Benz trucks. Invest in your fucking infrastructure AmeriKa.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Infrastructure must be paid for socially but owned privately and any and all repairs or future investments will be subsidized in order to please Jesus Christ the patron saint of Capitalism.

  • artifex@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Plus speedrunning the financial failure of the USPS will let them dismantle and privatize it

    • nathanjent@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Then Trump can roll out his Uber-like mail service company where the workers provide their own vehicles and 60% more mail goes “missing” in transit.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I recall they forced massive retirement debt on uses to cause downfall

      Most federal agencies receive annual congressional appropriations to contribute towards CSRS and FERS. The Postal Service does not. Instead, it’s required to pay retirement contributions with agency revenue. USPS’s retirement costs are significant, totaling $10 billion in 2023 alone.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Those things, from what I heard, are an absolute necessity of an upgrade for postal workers. They absolutely deserve those vehicles. Just like the vehicles probably deserve and hunger for the flesh of the people who want them gone.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        their old grumman LLV’s are inefficient, cramped, HOT AS FUCK (no climate control you get a fan lol) that were harder and harder to keep on the road after nearly 4 decades of work. also, a tremendous amount of ‘postal work’ is not letters, but now packages - and these vehicles can’t hold much compared to the new ones.

        • percent@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          According to Wikipedia, the Grumman LLV was in production from 1986—1994… Which seems kinda wild to me in 2025.

          Also according to Wikipedia, when used for mail delivery, its average fuel economy is 8.2—10 mpg 😬

                • unphazed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Mine was a 94. An F250 pulled out in front of me. I braked, tried to swerve into the side street. He reversed. Wet road, I kept sliding. He had a dented door. I had a broken radiator, crushed hood, and bent front axle. Totalled. To the guy’s credit, he admitted he never saw me coming in my wittle red twuck and that I fought like hell to avoid a collision, and probably would have if he hadn’t reversed. Blue Book was 5k. I got 3k. No one was selling them at the time for less than 5k and I had a minimum wage job and needed a car asap. Got a neon and a bonus: no more moving requests.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, that’s quite an improvement for the company. How do the new ones improve the life of mail carriers specifically?

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not gonna take your word for it. Gonna need a source showing the EV’s were well received and performing as expected.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t know if the numbers compare, but I’ve talked to a postman here, and he told me that EVs save a lot of money for the postal service. Here, stick-shift is the way to go, and he told me that they basically wore down 1-2 clutches a year per car before swithching to EVs.

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just because they’re EVs…

    What other technological innovations have political parties been (corrupt) allergic to?

    I know Edison lobbied hard against AC power systems but there must be tons of examples over the years

  • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    and here I was just thinking, “Hey, I hope someone can give away something my tax dollars already paid for again. I really liked when Scott Walker gave away our trains, what a swell guy”

  • percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’ve never seen one of those on the road yet, but whoever designed them should probably consider a career change.


    EDIT: I’ve accepted that I’ll just never understand why some things get down-voted here. Like, do people actually like the way that design looks?

    It looks like a Grumman LLV somehow reproduced with a cartoon duck, a pug, and one of these:

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’ve stumbled into 3 very powerful headwinds buddy:

      1-Lemmy hates Republicans so they will support whatever Republicans are trying to get rid of

      2-Its an EV and EVs are cool

      3- Lemmy (especially c/FuckCars) HATES the new trend of trucks with very high grilles that block your view in front of you. The new mail trucks swing cartoonishly in the other direction, so it’s pretty much their ideal truck.

      • percent@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Ohhhh thank you for clearing some of this up! I’m still kinda new to this.

        That’s wild how many people seem to fit all 3 dimensions — and so strongly that they’re seemingly offended by some light criticism of any EV? Am I reading the situation right? (Edit: er, maybe it offended people that fit in one or two of those groups… Unions vs. intersections)

        Hot take (apparently): Some vehicles — including but not limited to EVs — are ugly. I stand by that.

        The old USPS delivery vehicle wasn’t pretty either, but somehow I think nobody would be offended by that.

        I swear social media people make me feel like an alien sometimes lol

      • percent@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not sure I follow. They designed them for social media? Or do you think I said anything referencing social media?

        Did you mean to reply to some other comment?

        • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’re judging the vehicle purely on how it looks and using that to suggest the designer should change careers; an impressively shallow take, but also a learning opportunity. The other reply draws the same kind of assumption, albeit with a degree of tongue-in-cheek, to make an ironic accusation that you are qualified enough as an “armchair influencer” to train the vehicle’s designer in the new career that you said they ought to seek.

          • percent@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m judging only the vehicle’s appearances, not the entire vehicle.

            Here’s an exhaustive list of things I know about this vehicle.

            1. It’s ugly.

            I assume it’s a huge upgrade over the Grumman LLV. For all I know, it could be the best vehicle in the world for that purpose, with the best drivetrain and battery tech available, and a huge cargo area to handle the present day’s e-commerce workload.

            It’s just ugly, that’s all.

            … that you are qualified enough as an “armchair influencer” to train the vehicle’s designer in the new career that you said they ought to seek.

            This is the confusing part for me. Where did I say that they should seek a career in being an influencer, or that I’m one? I’m not even remotely qualified in that field, and would never claim to be.

            • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I don’t know how you don’t think the new truck is adorable. It’s like a toy car, and I mean that as a compliment.

              It fits perfectly into some hanna barbera depiction of a pleasant neighborhood.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They look kind of dopey, but they look like they’d really do a good job of prioritizing safety for pedestrians, pets, and especially kids with the really low hood height. The minimum distance to see the road on that thing has got to be like three inches.

      • percent@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Valid point.

        🤔 I wonder if it could have been designed without that part altogether. I’ve driven one of those flat-fronted Isuzu box trucks before, and it’s crazy how much more you can see in front of the vehicle.

  • obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I am mad they want to get rid of them. We have already designed and started rolling them out. But I do think they look extremely ugly. Doesn’t mean we should get rid of them.

    • yumpsuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      They look like that for accessibility, to be driveable and comfortable for even the tallest and shortest postal employees, and that makes them goddamn beautiful.

      • obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I did not know that’s why they look like that. Makes a lot of sense but the original (to me) postal truck will always have a special place in my heart.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah it’s something like, the roof is so tall so that the 90th percentile tall American man can stand up in it, and the hood is so low so that the 90th percentile short American woman can see over the nose from the driver’s seat. It absolutely looks like a goober but basically all American adults can comfortably operate it.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s so cool that they’re unique. Nothing is ever novel anymore. Cheapest most boring everything. Except for rich people. At least these have character

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s how they operate now. They look on reddit for comments “oh next these fascists are going to ruin …” and that is how they get their ideas.

    Now shut the fuck up and enjoy your forever boot to the face. Remember, non-violence is the most important thing.