European Court of Human Rights ended up banning all legal efforts to weaken encryption of secure communications in Europe

This being the case, how can they try to reintroduce the legislation?

Touché

It seems a mention that the issue is known to Tor and being remediated should be higher in this article.

Oof! Cool perspective

I really hope they do.

Psychology, in particular, has a replication problem. Admittedly part of the reason is that no modern IRB would approve something like the Stanford experiment. But part of it, too, as you suggest, is down to rigged studies or other shoddy “science.”

It isn’t confined to social sciences. Dr John Mandrola routinely takes medicine to task for letting pharmaceutical companies run poorly-designed trials then cherry pick and spin the results for profit.

uBLock Origin seems to work well enough for me

IRC? Discord? Delphi Forums?

Don’t aircraft still use leaded fuel to this day?

Maybe hire better protection partners?

Damage control from the PR team shouldn’t be allowed to fix this. Publicly name the “protection partner,” publicly end their contract, apologize, and develop a transparency plan going forward.

Lesson learned: Never sell any of your company if you want to remain in control of it.

And now we know that you can’t (or won’t) read. That’s ok. But I do think that we’ve exhausted the possibilities of this conversation.

Fuck off. Stop assuming that you know anything about me, foolish asshole.

Now that the BLUF is out of the way, and I know that you’ve read and understood my comment, I’ll do you a solid to show that there are no hard feelings. You’re blocked.

My “opinion” is not wrong. It is scientific fact. Adolescent development is an area of my professional study.

Are there abused children in the world? Yes. Are their brains well-enough developed to make any lifelong decisions? No. That doesn’t mean that they don’t deserve help. It does mean that they are not mature enough to understand the ramifications of a no-contact decision.

I don’t wanna sound condescending, but please base your own opinions in fact.

At least I’m in good company :)

It isn’t really. But you are, of course, entitled to your opinion.

With respect, 16 year old brains are not physically developed enough to make that decision. It’s why we don’t let them vote.

Things may look different today. I stand by my suggestion.

Oh my. You’re right. Sorry about that

It’s checkmate in one. I’d probably resign and move on to the next game.

Maybe cut him some slack? A lot can happen in 20 years.