That’s patently false. You haven’t actually read the article have you?

Like I said, the chances of any human ever reading it are extremely small. Close to 0%. Shit like that is automated.

Maybe but 100k a day is not noteworthy for a country like Norway either.

Indeed, I’ve used airbnb several times now to rent a vacation home in the French/Belgian/German countryside. For that it’s great. Cheaper than renting a bungalow somewhere and you have more space.

100k a day is not even worth looking at for them.

Cool. At least they get to read something entertaining then. Also, I seriously doubt any of the input ever gets read by a person at all. Chances are it gets collected and processed by some application to generate a list of keyword for their customer satisfaction reports.

I usually just enter offensive shit if I’m forced to enter text.

Plenty of good office chairs available for normal prices in Europe…

Toddler car seats actually have good lumbar support though.

That’s nice but all of that is irrelevant. You can view tweets without making an account.

Also, not one government solely relies on Twitter to disperse information, it is just one additional channel. They also use their own websites, apps, TV and radio.

Why is it absurd? The best way to reach people is on the platforms they use. People are not going to install some government app or use a special website to see those kinds of messages.

Ah, that’s messed up.

Mental illness is supernatural? What does that mean?

I doubt it’s seriously hurting Reddit, if at all. People would really hurt Reddit if they just stopped using it entirely. No posting, no commenting and no lurking.

If only people would actually stop using Reddit instead of doing these useless “protests” like they do in /r/videos. They’re still using the site, that’s what Reddit wants…

I don’t have a promotions tab either. Or any tab for that matter.

Edit: I turned the tabs on, no ads in the promotions tab either. Maybe it’s not a thing in my country.

Does it? Never had one.

This is what Reddit forgot. They don’t implicitly provide any value, it’s the community that provides the value. Reddit is just the place where people happen to post.

It’s not an amendment, this is the actual law as it is adopted. The other document was just the proposal.

very few phones are used primarily in an environment of water immersion

They don’t have to be primarily used in that environment, they have to be designed to be used in that environment. The way this is worded is extremely broad and can basically mean anything you want it to mean. All current waterproof smartphones could fall under this exemption.

I love the EU and regulations like this but it always makes me sad when they make them broad and open to interpretation because that means corporations will find ways to get away with whatever they want.

You cannot have a consumer device at a reasonable price point, designed to provide water resilience, which also contains an open section to the power supply.

You certainly can. Look up any flagship smartphone and you can see that they provide water resilience and they have a charging port.