Non-normality confirmed, again…

Is this what they mean by Reflection?

Looking forward to combining this with CSnakes for seamless(?) interop w/pyhon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDbCqalegNU

They can reach me in another way if it’s important, or just wait a damn minute till I get back. The day my boss called me over and over while I was on the crapper (thinking I was ignoring him ???) was the end of that app on my phone.

I removed that shit from my phone, it’s so nice to be unreachable when not at my desk.

That’s ‘truthy’

IIRC…Creators say it doesn’t matter, either pronunciation is fine.

Free Luigi

It is good for the programmer to know how the computer operates, as well.

When they go low, start stomping the fuckers

Aziz! LIGHT!

I’ve also experienced this

I feel like if one tried to follow all of these “rules” at all times nothing would get done, at all.

I learned everything I know about c# by looking it up on Google, copy and paste is king. Just keep working with it until you can make sense out of the code you’re copying. An llm would work similar but might feed you bs, everything you’ll want to know is on stack overflow. You’re unlikely to have an original, unasked question…I never have.

Check out this reference (not mine): https://gist.github.com/DanielKoehler/606b022ec522a67a0cf3

The first difference that I would point out is c# use of static typing, where python is dynamic. This author is using the var keyword to avoid specifying a type for variables. The type is, instead infered by the code that follows the equals sign.

The next main difference is the use of whitespace. Python is very whitespace aware, it uses indentation and line breaks to organize code. C# is whitespace agnostic in most cases and separates blocks of code using curly braces {…}, statements must end with a semicolon;

In C# collections are organized by how the data is accessed and whether elements can be added or removed. Arrays are initialized with a set of items and can’t be made longer, a List can be added to and can be removed. The key point is that all items in a collection are of the same type.

Complex objects (that have properties and methods) can be structs, classes, or records but they all basically do the same thing and interact in the samish way. You have to use the new keyword to make a new instance.

Classes and records can inherit from another where as structs cannot. Properties must have a type, methods must return a type or void. Method parameters must be typed, when calling a method the provided parameters must be of the proper type.

An interface describes requirements an implementing class, record or stuct must meet (i.e. properties and methods). You can’t make a new interface, it’s more of a qualification.

I hope this helps some

Which is why billionaires shouldn’t be a thing.

Yell “Jump!”

I find articles on the onion to be funny in some way. This was just naked approval of the status quo.

I think “describing it as if it were normal” only helps the people who support this arrangement because it gets normalized. That’s where the accusation of conservatism came from, that and the way they tried to shut me down with insults.

Edit: given that there are likely to be a lot of people that agree with this argument unironically, doesn’t it seem irresponsible to play some game where you pretend like you support it? Without ever coming out against it at the end?

Really, it’s just naked approval, with any disapproval left as an exercise to be performed by the reader.

Ii is the real state of the world, but I don’t see any disapproval in the text.