

In that case, they can only not regulate the crossing of the VPN signal across state lines, but they can still regulate your connecting to it, which happens in Michigan.


In that case, they can only not regulate the crossing of the VPN signal across state lines, but they can still regulate your connecting to it, which happens in Michigan.


Probably like 2–3 years ago I switched from Plex to Emby because the Plex app on my TV was becoming bloated and slow.
Even back then my TV was hitting 5 years old and still working great. Why the hell should I be forced to scrap a perfectly good television just because some corpo wants to ship overly bloated apps with too many animations?


Well that depends: is your NAS on the local network?
If yes, then personally I just use SMB.
If no, then fuck if I know. Lol.


Anytime!
Good luck, friend!


Can second this. I also use Ironfox + NoScript (among a few other extensions).
Though I will say that an annoying trend in some websites nowadays is to make the site not work whatsoever unless NoScript is completely disabled, even if all the scripts are whitelisted. So, yeah, be prepared for that bullshit.


You’re not wrong.
Threat model. It’s all about the threat model.


I think I’ll try using that hotkey (or something similar)!
Thanks for the suggestion. ;D


That is definitely a helpful alternative. Thank you. :)
On a side-note, one rather annoying thing I noticed back in the 2.x days was the inability to set [] as part of a keyboard shortcut (ideally, for switching image tabs). According to this SE thread, it’s because of the inherent limitations of GTK2—the [] key is “reserved for the GTK library”. However, the thread also said (second comment) that
What really should happen is that the Ctrk-tab is used in a tabbed display to navigate the tabs. Note that Gimp currently uses the obsolete GTK2. Things could be better wit the GTK3 that will be used in Gimp 3.0.
Are you aware if things are indeed any better now that GIMP uses GTK3? Because unless I’m doing it wrong, it still doesn’t seem to let me select the [] key in the Keyboard Shortcuts window.


You’re welcome - I hope you have a good time with it!
I appreciate that. Thank you.
If you have pasted an image but not yet made any selections on it then I would have thought that there is no selection to crop to yet.
Only if you press ctrl-v while having no canvas open. But, if you have a canvas open already, and the canvas is bigger than the image is, you’d want to crop to selection which would get rid of all the extra canvas around the actual image.
Although, looking back at Edit 1, yeah I should’ve been more specific. That’s on me. Apologies, I have rephrased. :)
Edit 1:
Also, I realize I got a little heated with Edit 1 & 2. I do apologize if I came across as rude. Again, I have very little but respect for the people who work on this, and believe in the project. Unfortunately, it does have quite a ways to go; but hopefully with the work that has been with the 3.0 backend overhaul those other things can come sooner than what has come before. :)


I appreciate your insights in the matter, and with 3.0 here I may have to give GIMP another try!
I heard 3.0 came out today but I haven’t quite gotten around to trying it out. (I just got home recently, so…) I think I’ll go do that now! :)
Edit:
Sigh… Yeah it definitely still needs improvements.
If I copy/paste an image onto a blank canvas (where the canvas is bigger than the pasted image), then press Shift-Ctrl-X to crop to selection; it doesn’t work.
So I look it up and find that the Crop to Selection option is located under the Image tab. Okay, so I click Image and go to click Crop to Selection. It’s greyed out.
I go to find out why, and according to the Documentation, it is greyed out if “there is no selection for the image”.
The Crop to Selection command crops only the active layer to the boundary of the selection by removing any strips at the edge whose contents are all completely unselected. Areas which are partially selected (for example, by feathering) are not cropped. If there is no selection for the image, the menu entry is insensitive and grayed out.
Why it doesn’t automatically treat copy/pasted layers as selections is beyond me. Most other paint software (even MS Paint!) does this. It’s basic design nowadays.
Just why? Why does GIMP have to hurt me like this? T_T
Edit 2:
And it needs to have Lanczos interpolation available for resizing. At present, it only has Linear, Cubic, NoHalo, and LoHalo, whatever the hell those last two are as I’ve never heard of them before.


GIMP 3.0 brings non-destructive editing.
Ah, that is good news! I actually heard about that but kinda forgot, so thanks for reminding me.
It looks like the UI is going to be pretty similar for the time being
Balls.
but the developers have set up dedicated groups to work on it.
Well there’s that at least. It seriously needs a tune-up in that department.
I’m probably one of the rare people who is used to it/likes it as it is and doesn’t really want to re-learn it if it changes but anything that helps new people get involved and feel positive using and improving GIMP is welcome in my book.
I appreciate your candor and your position. I know it must have been many hours of struggle to figure everything out to the degree you have. But as you said, this would help new blood get in the door. After all, sure, overcoming a program’s overly obtuse UI & UX is definitely a thing to be proud of, but frankly it shouldn’t be that obtuse in the first place. Very few people have, or even should be expected to have, the patience to struggle for a half-hour (or more!) to figure out things that in most other programs can be done in seconds. (This isn’t an exaggeration; I’ve had to do this, and only because other programs on Linux were no better.)
On the surface it might look like all that has happened in 3.0 is the introduction of Layer Effects but my understanding is that the whole thing has been re-written to make it easier and faster to make future progress with it. Hopefully this will be a reboot for GIMP!
This is good to know! I’m frustrated with GIMP but I still love the ideas it represents, and am hoping it improves to be able to meet the expectations users want to have of it!
to rotate a layer press Shift+R
You are a goddamned saint.


Oh that’s good! Thanks for laying that out for me. And, please, don’t take what I say as bashing the one guy who’s working on this (at least I hear it’s only one person). I think for a single person it’s incredible what they’ve gotten to, and I salute them for that. I was merely explaining it from an objective viewpoint. I have very little but respect for the guy behind it all.


Exactly.
And even with the stuff it can do takes 10x longer to do than with most other raster editing software because the UI and UX is so darn convoluted. Like, seriously, I want to like GIMP, but frankly I and most people in fact ain’t gonna spend 10 minutes trying to figure out how to rotate a layer. Lol.
Frankly, at this point, I just wish Paint.\NET was able to be run on Linux, but I believe it still uses some Windows-specific components—can’t remember what they are—that can’t quite yet be replicated properly using Mono. (Might be some Windows-specific DLLs? Idk.)


Oh I did not realize that! Excellent. :)


This is good news. There are a lot of great FOSS alternatives on Linux, but raster editing is one of the last few blind spots, I’ve found.
GIMP, meanwhile, doesn’t even have nondestructive editing and also can’t draw basic shapes (like squares, cylinders, etc.), can’t seemingly rotate layers without opening the [floating RMB menu] > Layer > Transform > Arbitrary Rotation dialog window, and good GOD the floating menus can go fuck themselves. How I hate the floating menus. Did I mention the floating menus suck? Not sure if I mentioned that.
Anyway, this switch to 3.0 is really needed and I’m genuinely excited to see the changes it brings, to the UI and the UX in particular.
Just a shame that they’re switching over to GTK3 when most other developers seem to be transitioning to GTK4.


pealing the protective film off the screen
Ohhhhhhhhhhh yeeeeeeeeaaaahhhhh…


^ The real question.


Oh I get it! It’s certainly not easy. Haha. I struggle with it myself, but I’ve noticed that my mental health improves the more uncluttered my external life is, and my browser is a part of the latter.
“A tidy room is a tidy mind” and all that… It’s not 100% accurate, but it’s got a ring of truth to it, I’ve found, at least for me.


You know, I’ve been trying Zen and although I still prefer horizontal to vertical, I can see I was actually somewhat wrong about what I said.
The sidebar is actually expandable (they don’t make that clear) and if you do expand it beyond its default, you can actually see more of each tab’s titles. It actually helps a lot if you have a shitload of tabs.
If you are like me however and typically try to have only a smaller number of tabs pinned (or consistently open), typically no more than like a third of your screen width at most, then there really is not much of a difference unless you’re already used to vertical over horizontal tab bars.
Can confirm. I’ve used FitGirl for years and countless games and have never once had an issue with malware. She seems pretty reliable on that front.