…no?

oh that is clever!

I hate my logitech k400, it’s feels like a sheet of paper blocks the signal.

I disagree, lots of things are much cheaper and worse.

Clothes are much cheaper and far worse. Power tools are generally a lot cheaper bit also built to break.

Houses are somehow more expensive AND lower quality though.

someone didn’t read the article ;p

What am I missing, hasn’t this been in i3 since like forever?

What happened?

edit: never mind, i should learn to read the fucking article hah

I hear he was a pretty good speaker 🫣

geologists could also tell you where the best rocks are.

FTFY

If we put it like that, every other energy source on earth begins that way and adds at least one conversion step.

… except for fusion of course.

Solar cells, technically.

boiling water systems have a thermal efficiency of ~40% Solar cells are closer to 45% efficient

One could say he did the wrong thing for the right reasons

This is just plain false.

There is no theoretical size limit to unobserved quantum systems, although it is practically hard to achieve large ones.

the largest ones we’ve managed are over 100 atoms. https://www.livescience.com/19268-quantum-double-slit-experiment-largest-molecules.html

Yeah its about quantum systems interacting, not sentient beings watching.

still pretty mystical though in my book!

does dry running have any meaning on a function that is inherently stochastic?

the face is switched yeah, that’s what I am referring to

You sure? this would be quite simple to whip up in photoshop

deleted by creator

matter changes state based on temperature

This is a gross oversimplification and your experiment proves that :)

That is not infinity, its undefined.

This only works if you use a one sided limit.