But not really a NEW problem. We knew LLM’s are trained on aggregate human data. We know aggregate human data is fundamentally flawed, inconsistent, unreliable, etc.
Like was there a point at which people just decided, nah AI is just plain accurate? Or is that just what morons always thought despite the permanent warnings plastered everywhere saying THIS AI CAN MAKE MISTAKES, CHECK EVERYTHING!








Going by the votes, it seems the answer to your original question is no, no nuanced discussion around these parts, and apparently fuck you for wanting that. Lol, yeah, I just avoid mentioning the things I find it useful for, no one cares, and they’ll think you’re just as bad as billionaires flying around in private jets, while they use their smart phones and Nike’s like hypocrites.
Just don’t touch AI discussion with a 10ft pole.