• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • Favorites:

    • Veronica Mars (just the perfect match for the show’s vibe and a damn catchy song)
    • Fringe (loved how they used it later in the series to match the universe/time period the episode was set in)
    • True Blood (a classic, wish the show matched its atmosphere beyond season 1)
    • Jessica Jones (so underrated)
    • Severance (extremely creative and memorable)
    • Stranger things (hate the show, but the intro is undeniably brilliant in its simplicity)

    Honorable mentions:

    • Yellowjackets (fun!)
    • Dexter (love the concept, hate the song)
    • The 100 (after a basic title card in season 1 they actually added an intro for the rest of the show, with the content changing to match the theme and setting of each season)

    I can’t really think if any “worst” ones although in general I don’t like when shows only do static or just very low-effort title cards. Some examples that come to mind are Breaking Bad and The Boys.


  • I think for me it’s not so much the amount of episodes but how they are released. Most of my favorite shows have varying amount of episodes per season but they all were released weekly over several years or at least months. And I’ve come to the realization that the reason why I can’t grow attached to modern shows the same way I could with 90s-00s and early 10s television is that binging 6-10 episodes over a couple of days once a year just isn’t the same kind of experience and emotional investment as following a group of characters and a plot week by week over several seasons, literally growing up with them and the story.

    I’m not saying today’s model is all inherently bad but I personally often miss that kind of old-school television where reaching over a 100 episodes was almost the norm for even semi-popular shows. I wish they could coexist.




  • “I waste my time in the morning and evening
    Caught in a feeling
    I lose my mind looking up at the ceiling
    It’s just a feeling, it’s just a feeling…”
    Part III - Crumb

    “It’s not meant to be a strife
    It’s not meant to be a struggle uphill
    If you’re bleeding, undo
    If you’re sweating, undo
    If you’re crying, undo”
    Undo - Björk

    “Past love, come back to yourself
    Don’t keep reaching out to him
    He can’t help you now
    It’s a past life, so come back to the time
    It’s been far too many nights, and you still cry”
    Past Love - Kimbra


  • I’m not sure what you mean. Flexible OLED displays have been around for a while and foldable devices are just an example of the technology in use, but we’ve had them in consumer products way before that (phones with curved edge displays, for example). The potential for flexibility has always been intrinsic to OLED displays because they don’t need a backlight. The reason our phones don’t bend and flex like the “device” in the video isn’t because of the display, but because the battery, processors, ram, speakers, ports and all other components are not flexible and won’t be for a while. The device in the video does not include those, there is a ribbon cable coming out of the bottom connecting the two screens to the actual hardware.



  • I can’t speak about Flutter or React Native, but what I can say is DON’T use Xamarin Forms/MAUI. As a native Android developer I had to start using Xamarin after changing jobs and it’s been one of the biggest regrets of my career, honestly. Literally nothing works like you would expect it to. I understand the idea of writing the same code twice is intimidating, but trust me, nothing beats native development. Nothing. I can say with 99.9% certainty, you will regret not going with native if (or when) your app requires any vaguely complex feature to be implemented into it. Swift and Kotlin are similar enough that you can literally write the same app natively for both platforms faster than it would take you to write them in any cross platform framework (or at least Xamarin/MAUI), unless you’re making an extremely simple app with no customizations whatsoever.


  • I kind of gave up on Japanese years ago, but I’ve been trying to learn Korean for a couple months now. I started with Duolingo (great for basics like the alphabet, and in general for reminding you to practice everyday), then added YuSpeak (similar to Duolingo but way better paced/structured and with some useful systems to keep track of your weak points and review words and concepts effectively. Their Japanese course has even more features).

    Although the apps are a great way to start, like other commenters said, they really promote memorizing over understanding/using the language, especially Duolingo. So the greatest addition for me so far was actually ChatGPT (GPT 4). Now I can learn a new concept on YuSpeak or Duo and then immediately go ask ChatGPT to go over it together and make up some exercises for me to do. It really works surprisingly well, and in just the few days since I’ve started using it, it feels like my ability to write and read the language has improved exponentially compared to when I was only using the apps. I also fare much better in the apps themselves.

    Of course ChatGPT is not 100% accurate, as we all know, but it opens up so many learning avenues that it doesn’t really matter, especially if you’re a beginner to intermediate student. Obviously it also can’t completely replace an actual teacher (on the other hand, it’s available 24/7, unlike an actual teacher, and it’s much cheaper too) and it won’t help with listening or speaking, but using it in conjunction with apps and a YouTube video here and there really creates a pretty effective and proactive learning environment.

    TL;DR: Check out YuSpeak and consider using ChatGPT 4.