Why, a hexvex of course!
Notepad++ is, at its heart, a text editor.
It’s lightweight, can run portably, and has some oddly specific but useful features such as dual window linked scrolling, syntax highlighting, and even allows regex for search/replace which is neat.
You can use it for coding (I use it for short python scripts), but that isn’t it’s main use.
VScode is, primarily, an IDE - not really something you use as a plain text editor.
Both kings bongcloud, both hoping their superior grasp of theory will win the cat over to their side.
For those who want to stick with Windows, Notepad++ is far superior anyway.
Oddly enough, Notepad++ doesn’t really have a full featured native Linux alternative (as of my last deep search around June 2025).
Good and evil are subjective - the idea behind “humans are a virus” is an implied negativity. Thus the counterexample mapping to a good virus ;)
https://magazine.hms.harvard.edu/articles/good-viruses-do
Not all viruses are evil, so it might hold up?
Testing video should absolutely be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExZEUZsgH3w
Not Unix, but a good project selling stickers to fund it…
(Not open source, but pretty neat nonetheless)
Clearly they gave every last fuck they could about that code.
And here we see Professor Moonmoon about to espouse his latest theories on goodboi theory.
Scientific reproduction, as in reproduction of a study XD
Scientific reproduction, not sexual reproduction XD
So, hear me out here, there is a huge reproduction crisis out there. In theory, you could try to replicate this study without the researcher being an asshole and see if it still works out and this would be a valuable line of research that could technically get funded.
I’m going to need a decent ship, some volunteers, and a 101 day supply of daiquiris.
Edit: (For clarity - this is scientific reproduction, not human reproduction)
The UK approach to illegal entry is already nuts - they isolate people, teach them helplessness, and pay a fortune to do it.
Not so much in London, and usually you need to pay for the public ones.
We live in but a bright second, yet are determined to fill it with darkness unending.
The three pathways for most academics
Option 1 - shit out a large pile of bad (either misleading, over-sensationalised, or just clearly partial work) papers, but get funding to do the same for another year.
Option 2 - work hard to create a quality paper, run out of time, no more funding, off you go to industry.
Option 3 - take a teaching intensive role and never have any time for research, oh and also get paid less than in industry.
Ehh…
So, it’s more a case that the system cannot prove it’s own consistency (a system cannot prove it won’t lead to a contradiction). So the proof is valid within the system, but the validity of the system is what was considered suspect (i.e. we cannot prove it won’t produce a contradiction from that system alone).
These days we use relative consistency proofs - that is we assume system A is consistent and model system B in it thus giving “If A is consistent, then so too must B”.
As much as I hate to admit it, classical set theory has been fairly robust - though intuitionistic logic makes better philosophical sense. Fortunately both are equiconsistent (each can be used to imply the consistency of the other).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2mvT1ddiBc
Alas, the game itself was long ago murdered.
Never heard of it, so now I will take a look. Thanks for sharing.