Counter point : Tibet was also it’s own empire long ago, it also was unstable during most of the Quin rule, kept it’s own political class since it’s medieval times, rebelled against and expeled ethnical chinese several times in its existence and was mostly a tributary of the several political entities that are seen as the precursor of modern China.

Llhasa was always it’s own thing under the mongolian rule, the quin dynasty rule, the gelug rule, ect… With their own tribal leaders, sub religions (from bon to all the flavors of buddist they had) perpetuating their own peculiar brand of rule on their people.

Three centuries are nothing compared to the thousand year history they had before the quin, and claiming that Tibet is chinese at the very least, a very large simplification, if not an outright attempt at disinformation.

Tibet is culturally, religiously, legally (in the sense that they had their own code of law) distinct from China and has been for next to always.

What you are claiming is akin to saying that Quebec in Canada always was Canadian because their indigenous tribes contiously were conquered by the English and French colonist in the 15-16-17 centuries…

Why not? Both needs skills to accomplish very well.

I’m not a frontend guy, but I like to mess with frontend stuff once in a while!

Flex is so fun!

Managing css masterfully is a skill in itself!

So mich this!!! You really distilled it!

It’s not even a secret, it’s not even hard to find rich people saying just that.

It’s simply the only thing that is going on.

We are stuck with people who think life on earth is just a way to get to heaven where everything is perfect, so they don’t care what happen here.

These people are taking a lot of long term decisions in the industrialized world.

We are also stuck with people who exploit their way to power, and frankly don’t care what happen in the future.

These people are also taking a lot of long term decisions in the industrialized world.

We are also stuck with the naive people who think everything is alright, because they wish it so

These people could be the balance of power but they instead choose to do nothing and sit on their hands because they think that in the end, everything will be alright.

I’m kinda depressed suddenly…

The plan is to let a lot of people die from the climate crisis and place the rich children in those positions.

It’s useful if you just don’t do…That. it’s just a new fancy search engin, it’s a bit better than going to stack overflow, it can do good stuff if you go small.

Just don’t do whatever this post suggested of doing…

Library still exist and are still consulted.

Google still exist and still is an advertisement corporation first and foremost.

AI will also be misused, but it can also be a good tool. It’s just not as magical as people tend to think it is.

This person is delusional and need mental health care.

Seriously, this looks like the start of psychosis…

The masses have been divided in the west.

Family links are next to none existant and people are seen as tools to an end.

Individualism made it very easy to make the whole of idea of “organizing” something fringe or hard.

People simply forgot we used to work collaboratively for our own good and welfare and see organizations as a feodal like link, because that’s mostly the reality of the westerner.

Barilla is homophobic or just italian? I mean they elected homophobia as a president…

Thanks for your work!

In canada they banned competition for no reason… It has to come from the imperial core and vassal states or it’s illegal

Yes! I also is interested in that because I can’t find anything about that anywhere!

You say that informal censorship is always dictated by class relations ?

That’s an interesting take.

I always saw echo chambers (what you call informal censorship) as inability to cope with a cognitive dissonance. It’s a way to emotionally protect one self from others beliefs.

In more than a way, a semi closed environment like lemmygrad is that, I think.

I don’t see it as censorship but more like a way to have constructive conversations about some subjects.

That’s an interesting take none the less!

Oh, what you are describing is called an echo chamber. It’s mostly an opt in mechanism?

I wouldn’t call that censorship at all! But I get your point.

The only thing you said I think is wrong is that de facto censorship always exist.

Censorship is created by a social entity hidding or faking data. Any advanced mind can take these incomplete or faked conclusions and from there find out that the data has been messed with.

Any “trust me bro” arguments can be rejected from the get go. Any information without it’s reproduction steps has no meaning, only an agenda.

People are pretty bright animals on the individual level, but where they fail is that they are social animals which will take cue from other social animals and social entitiesml.

What you see as de facto censorship is only a natural consequence of this mechanism.

But this can be countered with proper education of both the social animals and the social entities.

Fatalism is not needed here because we know that we can build social constructs that can change both how the social animal and the social entity comport themselves.

All in all , a censorship attempt, for a social animal that reject social cues from it’s peers, is at best an attack on it’s agency and intelligence, as worst a proof that the social entity has a hidden agenda and whishes a bad outcome to the censored.

And this attempt will by itself, because the social animal has an advanced mind, create an interest in what the other entity is trying to hide.

We can see this in action with antivaxxer, flat-earthers and so on, in which de facto censorship does not exist.

These examples are not the best, because they also get influenced by bad messaging -a sort of propaganda created by bad actors be it animal or entities - but they examplify the mechanism I am talking about.

Sorry, my English is quite poor this morning as I am very tired from bullshit events in my life.

So if im not very clear, I’m sorry again.

I don’t think censorship is the way. I feel it’s a fear driven approach and paternalistic.

It’s easy to see with your own eyes the decay of western society, because the supposed material gain is rooted in elitism and barely hidden exploitation.

The only way to convert the liberals is to show them what is really going on in the material world of western society. Keeping it censored will allow liberalism to fester and grow unchecked in china as these people will have their ideas reinforced by not being in contact with what liberalism really cause.

No,

Serious teams know that building big software is hard and that starting by having a set deadline is the first failure point of a project.

Serious team wants a set budget and feature set. They also want a dialog with the aquiring party, because as you dig deeper in the software you uncover oddities. These oddities are more often than not a failure of the aquiring party understanding of their own business operations.

And thus, a serious team will help the aquiring party refine their business process by either removing useless steps, adding missings steps or changing a step in the overall workflow. And that’s were the most of the value of making a new software comes from.

Doing waterfall will stop this from happening and will remove actual value from the software because it’s going to be bloated with useless things that were badly understood by the aquiring party.

Agile is about producing as much value as possible, as fast as possible, in a set budget.

English is my third language so sorry if it’s hard to understand or feel aggressive.

I have no idea what I’m talking about but would that be enough to replace the magnetosphere? From what I understand, a Magnetosphere is needed to have a sustainable colony, unless this has been disproved recently …

I don’t feel like I have to discuss with someone who clearly is in bad faith.

Go learn about a subject before talking about it, that’s it. All you said was petulant bullshit. Go read La conquete du pain or something before talking about anarchy, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about and instead are reugitating speudo-intellectual word salad.

If you’re so fragile you feel you need to block me, i have no words for you other than : go touch grass, go read about your subjet and come back a better person.

I wish you well!