Live Your Lives

To be clear, I agree with you like 95% of the way, it’s that last 5% that I still think you are overselling and would like you to be more careful with.

The problem is that Hardin’s argument simply isn’t much of a scientific one in the first place and is instead much more of a logical one. (I was being sloppy when I asked for direct evidence, so sorry about that.) Hardin made the massive assumption that people are wholly self-interested. If people are only trying to maximize their own share of the resources regardless of what it might cost others, then it is impossible to escape the competition that creates for the limited amount of resources that the commons provides. All of the examples and articles you’ve brought up attack that assumption and/or focus on the conclusions Hardin made based on those assumptions, but do nothing to actually disprove the fundamental argument behind the tragedy of the commons.

I think you are overselling it’s incorrectness and so horseshoeing back around to being like the people who oversell it’s truthfulness. Yes, the tragedy of the commons is misleading if taken in isolation, but something being misleading does not automatically make it scientifically incorrect. Do you have direct evidence or an argument for why the tragedy of the commons isn’t the most likely outcome if the circumstances just so happen to match the assumptions Hardin made?

What rules do you believe make for a definition that isn’t contrived? How do you exclude asteroids from your definition or reject other dwarf planets like Ceres without making up contrived exceptions of your own?

As far as I’m aware, most people who think the world is naturally just think that such justice comes slowly, and with wild swings away and towards justice happening in the mean time. So you still need to turn the ideal of justice into reality in the mean time either way.

Can someone explain exactly how this “Trump-proofs” the Federal Reserve? I don’t get it.

Most fish have teeth, actually.

So what open models should casual users be looking at getting into, then? Which ones are the best and the most ethical, and what kind of stuff is available for free?

In case you didn’t know, diorite is a real type rock as well that is similar to granite.

Isn’t Turkey blocking the strait that connects to the black sea? Also would Russia not be able to destroy them fairly easily?

More than likely not AI: https://sketchingscience.org/

Browoser

You know how telescopes often use glass lenses to bend light into your eye? A gravitational lens is just a naturally occurring telescope, except that the gravity of a large object is the one bending the light towards us. From what I understand, an Einstein lens is just a gravitational lens where the elements for the lens sit in a particularly good setup.

When did /s change from sarcasm to serious, or is your post a joke itself?

Pinus Radiata on Wikipedia

Tardigrades are effectively invisible to the naked eye, so it might be rather disappointing.

They put the North half of North Dakota into Pembina, though, so I don’t know if that really counts as consolidation.

30 hours is what’s normally considered full time, but there is no federally mandated minimum, so it’s really up to the individual employers.

An Internet meme, or meme (/miːm/, “MEEM”), is a cultural item (such as an idea, behavior, or style) that spreads across the Internet, primarily through social media platforms like YouTube, Twitter, and Reddit. Internet memes manifest in a variety of formats, including images, videos, GIFs, and other viral content. Key characteristics of memes include their tendency to be parodied, their use of intertextuality, their viral dissemination, and their continual evolution.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_meme

In conclusion, it is a meme, but it’s debatable how much of a meme it actually is.

Why would we need such a strong sensitivity to it?

And you forgot how much you normally put in anyway.