MushuChupacabra

Changing polling methods sounds a lot safer than getting fired and sent to the front.

I’m more interested in the put up or shut up, and less interested in the alleged internal struggle that prevents them from doing so.

Produce.

Science is used to help Describe, Explain, Predict, and Control any phenomena studied. The Describe and Explain part would be the pure science, and the Predict and Control parts are the applied science part.

Instead of letting a Flat Earther moo on and on about the Describe and Explain part, force them to show devices, procedures or processes that have been created out of Flat Earther Descriptions and Explanations of reality.

If their observations are accurate, they should be able to demonstrate or generate something useful from their special knowledge. It should be something that simply cannot be generated using conventional Round Earth Descriptions or Explanations.

Tl;dr: Flat Earthers are unable to demonstrate practical application of their special knowledge that improves any process.

If they don’t produce, the discussion is over.

This is the price you must pay for allowing Putin to live.

That’s the total opposite of secret.

I have a couple of Dawkins’s books, on atheism and evolution, both solid works.

Learning that he’s a TERF with GPT psychosis/ELIZA effect is wild.

I just think it’s wild that there’s so much copper to be found in those minimally secured data centers.

Monica won’t like this.

Consider this a general comment regarding all that you’ve “contributed” here:

You should sue whomever taught you how to write persuasively. They’ve made you look breathtakingly stupid.

Reasonable.

I do think he should give the dying from cardiac arrest method a try either way though.

You’re talking out of your ass.

Here’s a plan that will wipe out world hunger in less than six months, and anhilate every so-called structural issue you care to claim:

List the wealthiest humans on the planet, and say out loud that food, shelter, education and Healthcare need to be spread more evenly.

State that the wealthiest humans on the planet will be executed one at a time, at the end of each month, until everyone feels pretty good about their basic needs. State that the executions will start with the wealthiest, and work down the list.

We didn’t have a scarcity problem, or a billionaire problem, we have a distribution problem.

One hundred percent false and misleading. The billionaires are the scarcity problem. It’s the extreme hoarding of wealth.

All the supplies in the world mean nothing if we can’t distribute the goods and service to everyone.

We do not lack the means to distribute resources. That is always available. The lack of distribution is wilful, and not an unfortunate side effect of something working well.

You could snap your fingers and make unlimited food in front of you, but starvation would still be happening.

Thankfully, you can see that there is a robust shipping infrastructure around the planet. Which once again negates the idea that it is an ability to distribute problem, and highlights the very real Unwilling to Distribute issue.

Or, you could just die of a heart attack, and no longer worry about it.

Try that.

I trust Global Tetrahedron

This is a funny joke to be laughed at and then quickly forgotten, as everything is perfectly normal.

🌻 🌻

So not a refutation of the claim, just whataboutism.

So are you seriously saying you didn’t get my sentence as an implication that I doubt your ability to detect AI has been used in a game you bought previously?

You don’t get to pivot.

I said I won’t buy slop. You said oh bullshit you’ve probably bought some without even knowing/how could you tell, implying that I am talking out of my ass.

Produce the evidence that I have purchased some slop, or shut your fucking yip yap.

I mean this was my original reply and you went into some kind of defense for me not knowing what you bought or will buy. No shit Sherlock.

Your defense was to back down from your original accusation, and and attempt to shift the conversation away from that which you couldn’t substantiate.

Might I suggest that you just sit the fuck down, as you’re too far behind to salvage your initial turd of a comment?

I dont understand your reply at all,

This is entirely a you problem.

are you implying you are the developer yourself?

No, you’re just making things convoluted in your own head.

Otherwise this sound like a comment aimed at something completely different.

Once again, that’s a you problem.

The reality is that I made a declaration that I don’t buy slop, you challenged that and implied that I probably have. I then asked you to state which slop-inclusive games I’ve purchased (or any games since TotK), and then you failed to do so.

Everything following that is you redirecting away from the fact that you ran your mouth with “I bet you bought more slop games then (sic) you’d like to admit.”, but cannot name one slop game that i have purchased.

Tl;dr: you wrote a check with your mouth that your ass can’t cash.

That effectively is an attempt to cancel the First Amendment.