All that and you still think that “doesn’t work” is the only problem that can happen?
- 0 Posts
- 140 Comments
Someone hasn’t done enough debugging in their life. I wish the lesson be as painless as possible
He better not have his spine poked by anything sharp :)
(in cade I failed at it: reference to Midra)
Nah. A bunch of llm code review agents say that produced code is of high quality, fire anyone who said it would have taken for them to implement same functionality more time than I have spent
Not the best description doesn’t cut it, it’s just false description. I can easily write a system with 100% test coverage, bugged as hell and containing so many weird abstraction tricks that it takes a significant effort to figure out even what is happening in the simplest scenario. And yes, part of that hundred percent coverage is going to be llm style: test that something does what you already know it does
Shanmugha@lemmy.worldto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•And just like that, the AI industry started caring about intellectual property
29·2 months agoNah. Any use is “fair use”, thanks
Shanmugha@lemmy.worldto
Linux@programming.dev•Surge in Systemd forks after the latest changes
8·2 months agoSo Lennart didn’t have a problem with systemd being prepared to comply with some local legislation , then refused the revert because “don’t bring this conversation here”. I am calling bullshit
Shanmugha@lemmy.worldto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•might be a form of Jevons Paradox
9·3 months agoYup. Worst part? We’ve produced people who make this justified: users and idiotic managers (really hard for me to estimate which of them are bigger source of shit). And we keep producing them
Shanmugha@lemmy.worldto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•why hard exit editor? Nano say at bottom.
4·3 months agoI no understand nano. I hate key combinations
What a nice way to say “I can’t back my standpoint up”. Anyway, do have a good day
Lol. Go on, show me how it is easier to understand structure of the code when I am 3 levels down, first two are already out of sight
No, it is an argument against it. We indent code so that it is more comfortable to read it, not in order to make it easier to understand
Human and machine read differently. If you ignore that (in case with indentation), then why bother with writing human-friendly form of code, when what is going to be really executed is something else?
Because I am not counting white space when I read. Or should we just write machine code/assembler/pick something straight away?
You are not alone, my friend
Just don’t use inheritance where more than a few descendants are predicted
Now I’m almost considering learning the language
Shanmugha@lemmy.worldto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•What a joke, can't believe people still voluntarily use this OS
111·4 months agoAs I’ve been enlightened recently, “but you see, it’s hard to create a .desktop link in GNOME, so microslop rulez”
Yeah, I can hardly believe my eyes
Shanmugha@lemmy.worldto
Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Americans are gonna be here for a while...English
2·5 months agoWake me up when you get past it
Thanks for notifying, I hate to know it’s true (no insult intended)