

It can also be forked at any time from the commit prior.


It can also be forked at any time from the commit prior.


OpenAI could direct anyone working at Astral to insert whatever they want
This would be suicidal for the project if it ignores the community. the project would instantly risk forking and OpenAI losing the ability to influence the ecosystem direction.
to your second point on needing contributors and infrastructor after a fork, while this is true, uv specifically has seen MASSIVE adoption both for hobbyists AND corporate interests. it has greatly simplified the overall python packaging experience. I would not be shocked if other corps began supporting a community fork if the main project went off the rails.
Bun, another open source project, has been doing just fine under Anthropic nearly a year later. Until there is more concrete info on the direction this will take, the fear is MASSIVELY overblown. uv is quickly starting to hit critical mass adoption and may be too important for it to end up in a dumpster.


Yeah it is gaslighting yourself. I get Openai isn’t great, but uv is open source.
Explain to me in great detail what exactly you think is going to happen here.
Also Bun, which was acquired by anthropic, is doing just fine as an open source project.


Too late for what exactly? Describe in actual detail.
You said it yourself, it’s open source so why are you running from it? The code is and will continue to be there in the open.


Don’t gaslight yourself. uv is open source and will not kill your grandmother. They just happon to be funded via Openai for now under their umbrella.


Hmm yes, I can now trust random people on the internet to provide me DNS and hope they are not logging my DNS lookups or feeding me poisoned DNS resolves.
what could go wrong


Vaxry is still pretty ableist, I think he’s just better at hiding it now. https://mastodon.social/@acidiclight/115348200226656321


Outed yourself as to using a bot to post lol.


Your goal is antithetical since even without tracking the LLM is still absorbing everything you say to it.
If you’re concerned, just run a local LLM and skip the web service one.


I’m open to new verbiage for its description.


They literally give space to nazis at that site.
What criteria in your head makes a site qualified for it to be a “hate” site to you???


A hate site where a lot of the worst of 4chan/8chan racist, nationalist, and lgbtq-phobic types congregate to organize harassment campaigns against people they don’t like. They have been linked to multiple people committing suicide.


Some old fashioned c++ and c developers, like me, feel more entitled to entrench more, and see Rust as a political movement, and not a serious tool.
I’m fairly reactionary against adding more Rust to stable projects.
You know, you have the choice to not fall victim to your own cognitive dissonance and instead help these people find common ground instead of being a dismissive stick in the mud right?
Maybe take the time to learn enough rust to see the other sides picture?
Not to mention it’s highly unlikely you can link me to any specific project you yourself specifically run where this ‘rust religion’ has been a problem that actually exists.


There’s a lot of irony here for you to invent enemy “holy rust” people in your head while failing to see your own projection of “use my holy C I preach and stop preaching others”.


The site is well known for harassment campaigns to the point of driving people to suicide, and users on those sites perpetuating that info are from that site actively introducing misinfo on popular platforms like reddit and hacker news.


Again, all of that is conjecture built on some weird “analysis” that came from the extremist hate filled site known as Kiwi Farms. I would not put much stock on the credibility of that info.
Hector and Lina are their own people. Anyone claiming otherwise has bought into the conjecture spread by a literal hate site.


She quit due to harassment. That’s it, that’s the story.


These talking points about identity originated from kiwi farms.
It’s this kind of weird unhealthy speculation that gets people to step down.
I’d not perpetuate it.


These talking points about identity originated from kiwi farms.
It’s this kind of weird unhealthy speculation that gets people to step down.
I’d not perpetuate their views.
Commit history literally exists, you can go back to the commit prior to changing the license and fork it. Do you understand git in the slightest?