I keep everything in Documents

I mean if you really want “we have life on earth”

I can already assert my intentions to stay on GitHub, even with all the AI and spyware and stealing data and whatever, all my code that is public is also available for anyone else to train a model, and all of my private repos are just backups for shit that’s probably not worth anything, all of my valuable shit I keep backed up my way. I guess if you were using GitHub to store your valuables then you’d be pissed but there’s the taking-responsibility part.

I kind of wish we’d get some copilot discounts if we opt in

deleted by creator

pairdrop.net works reasonably well for me

AI really needs dedicated hardware, I feel like if there was more chip manufacturing in the west we might have more diverse chips.

Frankly I’m really confused as to why this llm demand on ram isn’t encouraging new companies to manufacture ram. If this is a bubble then we all just wait it out, if it’s not a bubble then someone else would swoop in to take up the market.

I’m trying to think of a rule against using AI or even the rule of at least documenting where you use AI. There was one project where I tried to be diligent about including GitHub copilot as a co-author but then I slipped and forgot and there’s no point in bothering.

I think I’m just going to strongly encourage disclosing AI usage but there can be no requirements.

Wouldn’t it be the Colonials?

Rust is the foot gun, it’s so perfect that you genuinely cannot just sit down and type out what you need.

Recently I’ve just been getting co-pilot to do it

I have an alias that calls the copilot CLI with a prompt that says “set up typescript”

Fuck this

I add a lint rule to prevent using the any type. Solves the problem

deleted by creator

So what does this mean? Bc like (at least with my boss) whenever I submit ai generated code at work I still have to have a deep and comprehensive understanding of the changes that I made, and I have to be right (meaning I have to be right about what I say bc I cannot say the AI solved the problem). What’s the difference between that and me writing the code myself (+googling and stack overflow)?

We already have activitypub, and projects like Gitea are actively implementing it (at this time I don’t think it’s live enough yet)

I feel like we should be treating git as more of a federated system. What rule is there against pushing to multiple remotes?

Can I ask what this “personal information” could possibly be? I’ve been 100% aware of all the information I put on the internet and the only thing that really bothers me is chatgpt. What information have I put on the internet that I wanted to keep a secret but like “whoops” it ended up on the internet?

Frankly I feel like this is what most people feel like. I mean who cares that Amazon can recommend to me something that I might actually want, it’s still up to me to buy it if I want it. I’m not losing control if anything

There seem to be many of these multicellular animals who don’t feel like a singular individual animal. I was commenting on a post a few months ago about the most genetically simple multicellular animal, this thing has less base pairs than most bacteria, and it can also do this trick where disassociated cells recombine into new individuals. This creature also reproduce sexually if and only if the concentration of fellow individuals is high enough, cells will just leave the body and join a new one like for fun. It really calls into question what an individual is.

I built a custom keyboard, and I used the Mac version of the meta key instead of the windows key. Now that buttons serves as $mod for i3

“the natural consequences of your own decisions” is the best answer I have to most things