deleted by creator

compilers were pretty early on

https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2025/12/26/linkedin-hack-attack-alert---12-billion-users-must-watch-for-red-flags/ linkedin seems to suffer scraping, leaks, invasions on a yearly (probably more frequently) basis

agreed - but I just don’t see a future for a super heavy launcher getting refilled in orbit, landing on an airless body, elevator required, soft touchdown, soft launch (long term base plans) i’m being a bit too pragmatic in saying all this though

probably blue origin. they were supposed to reopen the bidding process and let more companies bud again since spacex is behind. spacex had 4-5 years already and this requires an exceedingly complex system. Boeing, Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin’s Orion already visited the moon as well and is on schedule to return in April. china will probably get there in 2030 as well.

not using a starship; it’s far too costly and impractical compared to a standard lightweight lander

unfortunately graphene only works on select devices though

was it ever truly open? everything is a google service

so true

starship isn’t practical enough for this…

I use this setup on one of my (1/5) arch installs - it’s quite nice and fluid overall but not my preferred solution. krinner is quite a nice launcher though

no shit

kudos!

beat me to the punch

and some of the solutions feel hacky and inconsistent

my kneeeees ><

I feel attacked

“three servings of yogurt she reportedly ate every day”

I expect it to drop further (US):

https://marko.tech/journal/fzf-ftw