parties are reflections of their voters.

And here I thought the elderly didn’t really believe in anything, but they sure do believe in capitalism…

mmmmm… mildly carcinogenic…

Teaspoons are fair because at that scale you might be talking about 0.5grams, which is harder to weigh and easier to eyeball.

This is about institutional memory. Like we know how to make a cassette tape player, but we can’t actually do it.

I don’t know if there’s a name for it, but an increasing number of recipe writers are using only weight based measurements. This is super handy because you just have a scale, add ingredients, and just tare as you need. The measurements are also more accurate because, eg, flour can be compacted, so “1 cup of flour” could vary by a lot depending on how you measure it.

Honestly I think as a “regular citizen”, this is somewhat aligned with what I want the police to deal with? Like assault, robbery, murder, they’re somewhat dealt with. The big problem is with Rape, but theft being the vast majority of crime with the vast minority of effort, that’s totally fine.

That’s why it’s solarpunk.

The “forgetting” isn’t individuals forgetting, it’s about institutional memory. Individually, there might be plenty of folks who can build chips, but they might live too far apart, or there’s no money in it, or whatever other mechanism which causes things to be built and the technology to continue. There’s a massive bootstrapping issue.

That’s why it’s solarpunk. Slower computers which need different software.

Imagine it’s the year 2000, 25 years ago now (deargod). The idea back then was that you switch over to Blue hydrogen (still sourced from Fossil Fuels) and build out that market for Green Hydrogen. As a usability switchover, it’s very close to Petrol as you can have petrol companies make and sell the hydrogen, so for the customers, everything is the same.

But, everyone dragged their feet on this. The government was successfully convinced that CC wasn’t real, companies (Toyota, Honda) had Hydrogen with their loser teams that didn’t make money, no one wanted to invest. Now we’re 25 years later, the whole world has changed, but Toyota couldn’t really change strategy because they never invested in BEVs (they wanted Hydrogen), but because Hydrogen also failed (and the ship has sailed on that now. BEVs are literally more convenient now) they’re stuck.

To succeed now they need to admit they fucked up really bad, and that’s going to kill their stock price, and that’s going to basically end the company so they can’t switch over to BEV investment this late in the game.

Depends on if you believe that using biodegradable plastics on your chip packet is dystopia because ruffling it around sounds different.

I think realistically the two are about different time horizons. Anarchism is when the protocols are in our heads. It’s how we live. Communalism, to some extent, is about existing in a world where the implied violence of the system will shut down any “pure” anarchism. Create structure so the hierarchies know how to deal with it.

Sometimes it’s not even about hostility. People just can’t imagine a world without what exists today. Just having anarchism in your head is revolutionary.

It’s still a dangerous spot though. The LNP votes will doubtless (largely) flow through to Labor. If enough people are spooked with the Greens housing policy, then the preference flows might not be as favourable.

Flamin’ Galahs!

Hi. Congrats on being a mod. This is pretty nice but honestly I’d prefer if each of these was a separate post and we could just read it and upvote each individual item. I do like your summary / thoughts though, it’s pretty cool.

The other nice (hopefully) side effect is that it can provide the seed activity to hopefully encourage others to also contribute.

Let’s start with the word “blame”: Veilguard isn’t bad on the whole. It’s possibly good, even. I think a lot of the problem with how it’s been received is that it’s not “Bioware good”, which can be a disappontment even for a good game, especially after coming down from Baldur’s fucking Gate 3, a once in a generation game.

So maybe if we said “credit” instead, and I think we can say yeah she sort of can take credit for the game. They offered her game director and she took it, and she put her name to it. I know it’s a shit position to be in, but if you look at Whedon and the Justice League, he passed the “credit” onto Snyder. Busche could have done the same if she chose, but she chose to put her name to it.

Getting a game which is going off the rails back onto the rails is really tough. Kudos to her.

I have a full fat rack, but I’d like to adapt the 10" onto it, is there some sort of adapter thingie to maybe go two-wide?

This mostly doesn’t happen in Australia. Zebra crossing means stop. A lot of pedestrians won’t even check, they just walk onto the road on a crossing.

The forces at play are far greater than you realize in scope and scale

I know it’s a turn of phrase but you don’t know me. I realise the scope and scale of how the world works, thanks.

Your pitching

The future you want

You’re assuming a lot given what I’ve said. It’s not an “in effect” thing either. You talk about actual systems in a way which invokes Gandalf magic when they work like Penn and Teller magic. You assume the article and any defense of it is naive, but you’re missing the simple reality that sometimes you can simply remove huge amounts of complexity and get a better result.

The internet, for example, is not magic. There were several competing communication protocols, from circuit switched systems to fax to pagers. The internet is able to do all of those jobs, and it is a simpler system than the ones which existed in the past. It moved some complexity around, and therefore removed a bunch of complexity which was unnecessary.

This increase in simplicity is also called the second industrial revolution.

Simplification is always regressive and backwards.

Perhaps you prefer the term decomplecting? Complexity is an overloaded term, but you literally follow up “simplification as a regressive thing” with a bunch of simplification which is effective. Since we are sharing reading lists, perhaps a bit of Dr Fatima and Think that Through on Youtube might help you. It’s clear you do not understand the article nor my points.