No, that’s the point of the meme. They’re using confusing buttons.

Example: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969725022776?via=ihub

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972726000978?via=ihub

but the original is not available for download on the publisher’s site.

Here’s the one I made screenshots of for the meme: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969725022776?via=ihub

Same.

It wasn’t, the full-size is usually smaller, but I always forget to ignore it.

When you read more papers from that publisher, you’ll get it.

Time to evolve that bookshelf.

look up the “carnivore diet” or “lion diet”.

It’s the ultimate form of LARP-ing as carnivores.

Don’t bother, that user is the moderator of “Friendly [email protected]”

You might want to update your literature.

There are ways to adapt, perhaps enough to avoid collapse just from that.

Here’s a good intro:

https://www.tabledebates.org/building-blocks/nitrogen-food-system

“ImAcArNIVorE”

The relationship remains the same even before industrial agriculture, probably more than with all the nitrogen cycle hacking.

There’s a shitload of literature on food security, why don’t you go read.

The energy relationships will always remain the same, matching trophic levels. We can get more food by eating straight from the primary producers: plants. No, marginal grasslands will not do.

Even going down for collapse, keeping the animal farming sector translates to more famine. And if you keep the luxury, that translates to more social conflict over luxuries, more mafia, more “leather underground”, more secret animal farming and detouring of food.

Again, this has been known for a long time with history, not just theory. Here’s a fun example from Germany: https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/troy-vettese-do-not-let-them-eat-meat/

lmao. What a pretext!

Imagine being a researcher and not keeping the original images over the figures sent with a paper.

And wouldn’t they have the upload to the AI slop platform? Or did they also delete that chat?

They could show the original images…

It’s not linear, bud. The loss of calories to raising animals for food is about an order of magnitude.

Animals raised on grasslands only aren’t going to replace the system, they’re already maxed out and represent a tiny amount of the total “flesh pie”. If you’re arguing for deforestation and draining swamps to create more grazing land, that’s just going to accelerate the climate heating. Also, the climate chaos and increasing heat will make this pastoralism a dead end since the animals will die from heatstroke, starvation and lack of clean water, along with various diseases.

Be prepared for eating plants exclusively.

then you better learn about veganic quickly.

Does this mean that the exploitation of bees by humans will stop?

There’s a lot more food once you stop wasting food land on raising non-human animals and cars.

Have previous G7 meetings achieved anything regarding global cooking?