• 13 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 5 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2026年1月8日

help-circle

  • I very much included that context.

    Lemmchen: “Wow steam machines are gonna be expensive”, on a thread specifically about a massive price hike on Steam Decks (due to memory pricing)

    Your comment just now once again reaffirms that you were trying to make the case that the machine’s lack of screen, battery, and optional controller will indeed offset the expected price increases of the memory.

    Everyone here is just trying to tell you that they disagree with your expectation/prediction.

    But that’s all any of us is doing, after all, is predicting.

    We think that the memory increases will be more impactful than not having a screen, battery (super negligible because it needs a power supply anyway), and optional controller, leading to a steam machine that will be over €1,000.

    If you do also believe that, absolutely none of your comments make any sense.


  • The conversation so far has been (paraphrasing) …

    1. Lemmchen: “Wow steam machines are gonna be expensive”, on a thread specifically about a massive price hike on Steam Decks (due to memory pricing)
    2. You: “Well maybe not, machines won’t have OLED screens, battery, and optional controller”
    3. Femtek: “yeah but those things aren’t why steam Decks are having this huge price hike. They are going up because of memory” memory is a shared component between Decks and machines.
    4. You: “yes, those things will impact the price, but these other things that the machine won’t have will also impact the price.”
    5. Femtek: “not by the same amount”
    6. You: “I wasn’t arguing that”

    What point were you trying to make if not that having no screen/optional controller would offset the increased memory prices?


  • Valve didn’t “fuck up” […] It is the scalpers and only scalpers to blame.

    This you?

    It was wrong from Valve to not do the pre-order dance and special ordering process they already did before.

    Make up your mind. You said you agreed with the commenter above, said Valve was in the wrong, and then when I suggest it’s okay to be mad at multiple parties, you switched your tune about Valve being in the wrong.

    To counter your analogy, it would be a like a shop owner had been robbed before and knows the method by which they have been robbed. They also have, in the past, successfully combated the robbers. Then, the shop owner announced a highly sought after new product and… took no precautions against the robbers. In fact, this is less of an analogy and just… what Valve did.

    You can be mad at the robbers and also be pretty annoyed with the shopkeeper for not doing the thing they had done in the past to successfully counteract robbers.

    Edited to add, I also kinda hate that analogy because in your analogy you’re painting Valve as a victim (having been robbed). Valve isn’t a victim here; they made bank.