My last info with CodeBerg and donations was that they had funding for the next years and recommended to donate to some other projects. Ist that still valid? Or am I remembering wrong?
As of now they are definitely looking for donations, so please consider supporting them.
Not sure if the post is about GUI vs non-GUI. I read it as use R or pandas instead if SPSS.
Jup, so meinte ich das auch. Kann natürlich sein, dass das auch das Testergebnis war auch wenn ichs nicht glaube.
Manchmal sind die angelegten Kriterien etwas seltsam und wirken willkürlich, aber man kann sich ja die Liste der Kriterien anschauen und muss nicht stur der Endnote vertrauen. Und zuletzt haben sie AV-Software getestet, das wirkte auf mich recht unseriös aber muss zugeben, dass ich den Test nicht gelesen habe.
There it says: Edibility: edible (contains phenyl hydrazines. Keep consumption low) Can you point to a source that supports your claims? The fact that they contain phenyl hydrazines was clear before and is discussed in the paper I linked. It even states it in ita first sentence.
Can you share some sources please?
My last info was that there is no proof that there is enough agaritine to cause toxic effects. Found this meta study from 2010 but would be glad if someone had an update. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1756464610000241?via=ihub
That might be a showstopper and I don’t know anything about AA when it comes to custom roms.
Pixels have really good custom Roms available.
I am somewhat sure that it was codeberg but not 100%. As of now they are definitely searching. I’ll edit my comment to avoid confusions.