

I see what you’re saying, but if you time yourself completing an actual puzzle, do you include the time before you even buy the puzzle?


I see what you’re saying, but if you time yourself completing an actual puzzle, do you include the time before you even buy the puzzle?
Sorry, you can’t just take offence, I’m sending you a 30 cent tikkie
Playing for mate
Remember, a thin paint will stick to a thick paint. Thanks, Bob Ross


It’s also why there’s usually bad spelling or grammar in those e-mails as well
The way I read it is that they forgot to cite sources, so technically it’s plagiarism. I didn’t take it as a bad faith effort of passing off someone else’s work as their own. Otherwise I would agree, I don’t think they’d treat the situation so flippantly.
“Oh are they?! Poor air snail scientists!”

Blellow jay


you are doing god’s work with the patience of a saint
I’m definitely the “um yeah I sure hope it does”
After letting the engine sit on the position for long enough, it eventually comes up with an even stronger line: Rdf1. Not going into the forcing line with checks turns out to be better, because black can’t deal with the pressure anyway, so white has time to add another attacker before moving ahead. Even with this “extra” move for black before the forcing moves come in, …Ke7 immediately is too late, mate is inevitable.
Prime example of an engine move, I don’t think many people would come up with it, especially since the position is already crushing.


duck chess
Neither is assigning a person to every natural number, so I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make?
Ah I see why they worded it the way they did. I would argue that’s just the limitation of the illustration, considering the text words the premise correctly, but fair!
There are more reals than naturals, they do not match up 1 to 1, for exactly the reason you mentioned. Maybe you misread the meme?
I watched that video mere hours ago!
Uh, source??