• 0 Posts
  • 140 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • I know, but as a physical, mobile object as a camera is involved I imagine it’s much more vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks than today’s TLS certificates for sites. There are more moving parts / physical steps and the camera is probably not always online.

    But in essence you are right, operating the camera the same way as a server should be possible of course. We need some basic trusted authorities that are as trusted as we have for our current TLS certificates.

    What it will prove, is whether the video is actually of a specific camera certificate. Not who owns the camera, if it has been swapped or if the video footage is real.



  • But how would one simple member of the audience easily determine if this whole chain of events is valid, when they don’t even get how it works or what to look out for?

    You’d have to have a public key of trusted sources that people automatically check with their browser, but all the steps in between need to be trusted too. I can imagine it is too much of a hassle for most.

    But then again, that has always been the case for most.












  • tweeks@feddit.nltoScience Memes@mander.xyzClever, clever
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you say that I assume you either only used older services or your prompt skills are lacking.

    ChatGPT 4 is really advanced and can create long coherent fluid texts (with source references). You can also ask it to write as a student or any other target and it will match writing styles quite well.