That’s for publishers, not users.

DLP broken? Didn’t heard of that.

I think he means something like challenge-response type of auth flow that while using user/pass, the password waa never sent to the server?

Will UK netizens able to use it?

That means only “authorized” clients equipped with “correct” DRM module can ever plays those video. If I have to guess, it would be Widevine L3 for browsers.

I used to use dedicated server from OneProvider in Paris.

Say I lived there. BBC needs fundings I get it, but what the BBC contributes to when I watch VoD? Not even watching live programmes as zero of the content have BBC ever contributed. When the content is licensed via BBC, I already paid part with my subscription. Thst’s a disgusting double dipping. If no one watches your programmes that’s your problem, and citizens have no responsibility to keep a corporate from collapsing. This shit reminds me of how NHK works in Japan.

While I’m using Proton rn, I’m planning to migrate to Posteo with Addy.io for aliases. However they all cost money. If you mean free email that’s not tie to a billionaire, I can’t think one off my head. You can achieve “free” by hosting your own email server as it sounds you’re intended for receiving only, but the electricity still cost some, plus you are doning free labor to make sure it is happy.

I will just get an AMD (7745HX?) mini PC with adequate RAM and call it a day. It should run almost anything that you throw in a light setup with minimal power usage.

I’m curious why he still carry all those things after he is done with it.

It’s simply the “secure” isn’t meant for users but the cooperations. Make it “secure” to their business.

IMO the correct use of AI in searches is keyword correction and suggestion, like a beefed up version of “do you mean”.

Which I do specified “in the broadcast domain”. Sure you can use it with VLAN but that more than the scenario I’m describing.

Didn’t they already done such thing before?

It doesn’t matter. Port configuration can switch around and the bottleneck is still there. Traffic with in the broadcast domain (i.e. subnet) will handled by the switch alone.

There is WiFi onboard so it can have some actual benefits, depending on design and how user access resources, but how likely you’re going to saturate that 1/2.5G link? Not even you stream some 4K movies from Plex to iPhone will does that.

That’s the only use I can think of but I don’t know if OpenWRT support VLAN cuz I never used it directly.

What’s the point of having 1G on WAN and 2.5G on LAN? Traffic won’t hit the LAN port until it’s routed to the Internet, yet the WAN port is the bottleneck.

Edit: Seems like I switch up the port speed but my point still holds as the bittleneck still exist.

I highly doubt if they really live stream the video you took, or pictures. I would much rather believe an OCR is being done locally and send it to a server for translation.

Wouldn’t DNSSEC makes the whole poisoning moot?

For-jail-o?