• Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    They wouldn’t be able to pay the creators due to sanctions anyways. Could be seen as a positive because it allows the creators to put pressure on the US to lift the sanctions on the country.

    • Redjard@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s also completely fine under all international law.
      Following copyright law is more like a trade agreement, so if you feel wronged enough as a nation it’s completely uncontroversial to suspend all or all international copyright law and deal with the consequences (mainly the us being very salty about it).

      The EU contingency for a US attack on Greenland for example is among other steps to suspend all US copyrights recognition and starve the US service industry.

      • vratajin@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m in the EU. I was anti-piracy in the past. It took Trump’s threats to our territory for me to stop paying any streaming services and actively engage in piracy. Now the money goes to the seedbox hosts outside the US instead of disney or netflix. I also started using ad-blocker for youtube instead of paying. I don’t think this is fair towards the content creators but i just can’t bring myself to give the US companies any money unless i absolutely have to. I will keep doing this until the US changes its laws/constitution to disallow someone like Trump from threatening their allies, oh and plus until they apologise and promise not to do it again.
        Not only will i not give them money, i will aim to cause them economical harm.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          I was anti-piracy in the past.

          Hopefully you realize the error of your ways and the vast damage done by the violent control of free information. The hegemonic narrative around “ownership” serves capitalism, not humanity.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The EU contingency for a US attack on Greenland for example is among other steps to suspend all US copyrights recognition and starve the US service industry.

        Ignore patents (especially medical), licenses, royalties and such while they’re at it.
        Ban all travel for any muricans (they should do it anyway 'cos measles) and invite them to leave the EU.
        Ignore right to repair.
        Nationalize any Big US Tech assets in the EU (datacenters, wharehouses) as well as bank accounts, use them to build EU digital infrastructure.
        Discourage usage of US tech (windows,AWS, etc) / encourage use of non-US tech.
        Stop using USD for any trading.
        Close down all US military presence or lock them in.
        Etc

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s absolutely nothing “positive” about Cuba joining a genocidal empire just so they can broadcast commercials.

      • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I never said Cuba should join the US, just that corporations could collect royalties on their copyrighted material if they weren’t barred from doing business with the country.

  • totesmygoat@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    If all the ai clankers can do it I have no problem with Cuba doing it. Hell if it’s from a studio that bent the knee to trump, it should be encouraged to everyone, expecally for countries tired of the USA

    • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Does this work both ways? If Cuba can do it, then AI companies can do it too? Or are we just gonna keep running with the double standards?

      I frankly never quite understood why so many piracy advocates lose their minds when AI companies do the exact same thing they do. I don’t buy the “but it’s for profit” argument either - downloading movies, games, or apps does the exact same thing. There’s no practical difference between saving money and earning money.

      • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Does this work both ways? If Cuba can do it, then AI companies can do it too?

        No, because we make such deferences out of empathy and social awareness, which is a thing for humans. Clankers, by definition, can deserve no empathy.

      • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        why are you asking questions backwards if tote already answered?

        a company is not a person, the only benefit a company can get from it is PROFIT and the value a real human being gets from pirating varies from pure entertainment to cultural capital

        • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          What you get from pirating is not having to pay. Purchasing a movie still gives you the same entertainment and cultural capital.

          Nobody is obligated to hand out for free something they put time, effort, and capital into creating and running. If someone can justify to themselves that it’s okay to download it for free, then criticizing AI companies for doing the exact same thing is hypocritical on their part.

          Making money and saving money achieve exactly the same thing: you end up with more to spend.

          • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah because saving money as an individual is the same as a company choosing to not pay copyright holders so they can make more profit from pirating petabytes of info

            Very clever, you are clearly very intelligent

            Let me put an /s just so this doesn’t go over your head too

            • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Company is run by individuals.

              I have no idea why you need to start insulting me now.

              • srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Despite being run by individuals I think there’s at least some amount of difference between pirating a book to read it and pirating all books in existance to make copius amount of profits.

                Not arguing for any moral superiority here, just pointing the difference.

                • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  But in both cases you have the option to pay - yet choose not to. If money wasn’t an issue, there wouldn’t really be any reason to pirate anything. That’s why I see piracy as a financial decision, and thus I don’t think piracy advocates have any ground to stand on when they criticize AI companies for doing the exact same thing. It’s not identical, but it’s equivalent.

                  One could even argue that individual piracy is selfish because it only benefits the one person doing it. AI companies at least are providing a product that hundreds of millions of people get value out of - and the vast majority of them get it for free.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s no practical difference between saving money and earning money.

        Oh, cool, so that means that I can pay my rent, utilities, etc. by torrenting. Where’s my fucking check?!

        • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I didn’t think I’d need to explain the difference between saving money and earning money but here we are.

          When you earn money, you get a check you can spend on more stuff. When you save money, you don’t get a check - that would be earning, not saving. Instead, you’re spending less, which means you have that money left to buy something else. Those savings are effectively what you “earn.”

          When you download a $40 movie for free, you’re left with $40 more to spend on something else. It doesn’t matter whether I hand you $40 to buy the movie or you pirate it - in both cases, you end up with the exact same amount of money afterward.

          • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I didn’t think I’d need to explain the difference between saving money and earning money but here we are.

            There’s no practical difference between saving money and earning money.

            Trololololololo

  • somegeek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    3 months ago

    Same for Iran :)) We have no copyright so there are official platforms like netflix with all pirated movies and the national tv shows pirated movies constantly. Also, not a single person buys windows or office licenses here :))

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      No one buys legitimate windows or office licenses anywhere, lol (except for corporations, I guess)

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 months ago

        Depends if you count OEM licences that came with their device as purchases, which would be the vast majority of people.

        • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I gave my Linux laptop to my brother and that fucker bought a separate retail copy of windows (because it’d be stealing otherwise). I’m ashamed to be related to that fucker.

            • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s infuriating, but if it’s your brother, unless he’s jeopardising an important priority in your life in a way that affects your life opportunities and/or wellbeing/health, ya should probably tolerate it somewhat. Like explain why what he did is a bad thing and let it be. Family discount. At least it’s not your parent that’s acting up.

              Anyway, I am just talking out of my ass here, free advice, and all that. I don’t blame you at all, I’d be pissed too.

              • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Oh i see him at family events I play with his kids. I even loaned him some money to buy a house. I just stopped talking about tech or exchanging tech. I stopped his access to my plex and nextcloud. I’m the tech guy of the family but he is blacklisted in tech.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine if they focused on creating tools that could jailbreak iOS devices, John Deere tractors, HP printers, etc. I bet they could sell that as a service. What could the US or American companies do to stop them? They could be Disenshittification Island.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    3 months ago

    Probably a good way to spread American culture into the country… Sweden has become super Americanized just because of American movies.

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    Do they have an official web stream? I think protonvpn has Cuba as a location, it would be interesting to see. lol

    • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I saw that, and thought if people use that most of the time a) proton would eventually invest in more/better Cuban servers, and b) less likely to have copyright lawyers try and look at it.

      Am I wrong?